One of the worst xkcd's. It just leaves out the information that the supposed "immediate massive action to limit emissions" is, in fact, a mass dying of humans; nothing else currently known to us would change the curve the way it is drawn.
alibero 51 minutes ago [-]
The current trajectory is also a mass dying of humans so hopefully we can thread the needle there.
noxer 33 minutes ago [-]
That's an assumption based on a multitude of assumption all of which could be wrong to various degrees. It's perfectly possible that birth rates will go down in the future and become negative and population will shrink and together with tech-progress it could eventually reach a sustainably level.
Yes, the chance of this happening is not great but it's not zero.
quartztz 54 minutes ago [-]
and that is supposed to make it better how, exactly? should we just not do anything since it's over anyways?
noxer 21 minutes ago [-]
Who said it makes it better? It's horrible, pretending that there is some kind of "massive action" that we should take, but that massive action would need to be to kill billions of people.
If you want to do anything, go ahead, but the only thing we know that would work is killing billions of people within a very short time.
Is that what you want to do? If yes, then how? It would need to be done carefully; if the world powers just start nuking each-other, it's not going to lead to the desired outcome.
And no, it's not over, the curve will just not follow the first or second line. That's all. The planet is still habitable at +4°C according to our best models.
https://m.xkcd.com/1732/
And no, it's not over, the curve will just not follow the first or second line. That's all. The planet is still habitable at +4°C according to our best models.